How can disaster response contribute to long-term development?
1. Even the most devastated communities retain capacities. Even if the physical/material infrastructure is destroyed, the communities still have strong relationships, personal skills, organizational abilities, important norms and values, effective leaders and the ability to make decisions.
2. Hold relief work to development standards. Every disaster response should appreciate and draw upon local capacities—and should be designed to support and increase them.
3. Relief efforts can be designed to address long-term vulnerabilities and to further the long-term development agenda. Short-term labor intensive projects can address ecological and environmental issues by undertaking needed mitigation measures. Similarly, housing reconstruction can adopt disaster reduction standards for earthquake-resistant homes and buildings.
4. Relief and reconstruction programing should not be preoccupied solely with meeting material needs. It must also integrate measures that support and enhance social and organizational elements (relationships, leadership, decision making, group capacities) and motivational factors, such as:
- sense of hope,
- ability to affect one’s world,
- feeling that efforts will lead to change,
- sense of community and social cohesion.
Adapted by Jasmine Walovitch, Communications Associate, CDA from CDA’s response to the 2010 Haiti earthquake: Lessons learned from Past Experience for International Agencies in Haiti in light of international response to the typhoon Haiyan in the Philippines.
This is part one in a three part guidance note series on Effective Disaster Response from Haiti to Haiyan. This particular post four draws key lessons from Rising from the Ashes: Development Strategies at Times of Disaster: